Table of Contents
Introduction
The NetSuite implementation methodology is the structured approach organizations use to deploy NetSuite ERP, ensuring the platform aligns with business processes, timelines, and strategic goals. The two primary methodologies are the SuiteSuccess framework and the BRD (Business Requirements Document) approach.
Introduced in 2016, SuiteSuccess was developed to solve delays and inefficiencies common in traditional ERP rollouts. It offers a faster, standardized deployment path built on leading practices. However, it’s unsuitable for every organization, especially those with complex operations or unique customization needs.
This blog compares both approaches and helps you determine which NetSuite implementation methodology best supports your go-live goals, customization requirements, and long-term success.
How the SuiteSuccess Implementation Methodology Works
What is the SuiteSuccess methodology in NetSuite?
SuiteSuccess is a standardized NetSuite implementation methodology designed to help businesses go live faster by using predefined industry practices and templates. It assumes that many companies share common operational needs that can be addressed with minimal customization.
The methodology is built on four core assumptions:
- Most businesses can adopt NetSuite’s leading practices without major changes.
- A high-level business process analysis can be completed early and used to guide the implementation.
- A Blueprint document, created from stakeholder interviews, captures the critical workflows for setup.
- Once the blueprint is approved, implementation moves forward using leading practices with minor adjustments.
Further Reading: C-Level Cheat Sheet: Why Choose NetSuite Implementation
Why Choose the SuiteSuccess NetSuite Implementation Methodology?
What are the benefits of SuiteSuccess in a NetSuite implementation?
SuiteSuccess is a NetSuite implementation methodology designed to shorten go-live timelines, reduce costs, and streamline deployment for businesses with standard needs. It offers faster value through pre-configured best practices and industry-specific templates.
Key Benefits of SuiteSuccess:
| Benefit | Business Value |
|---|---|
|
Faster Time-to-Value |
Reduces implementation cycles using pre-defined templates and workflows. |
|
Minimal Customization Needed |
Works well for companies with standard processes and minimal integration needs. |
|
Built-In Best Practices |
Delivers proven workflows that save time on process design and configuration. |
|
Improved Visibility |
Pre-built reports and KPIs enhance decision-making from day one. |
|
Operational Efficiency |
Replaces legacy workflows with scalable, modern processes. |
|
Lower Deployment Costs |
Fewer customization hours result in reduced consulting and IT spend. |
Limitations of the SuiteSuccess NetSuite Implementation Methodology
What are the limitations of SuiteSuccess in a NetSuite implementation?
While the SuiteSuccess NetSuite implementation methodology offers speed and structure, it may not meet the needs of complex or highly customized businesses. Its standardized approach can lead to challenges when business processes fall outside of “leading practices.”
Key Drawbacks of SuiteSuccess:
| Limitation | Explanation |
|---|---|
|
Limited Flexibility |
Predefined templates may not support unique workflows or niche industries. |
|
Risk of Misalignment |
Important functional needs may be missed if the blueprint is incomplete. |
|
Standardized Assumptions |
SuiteSuccess assumes best practices apply universally, which may not hold true. |
|
Constrained Innovation |
Less ideal for companies that rely on custom workflows or differentiators. |
|
Costly Post-Go-Live Fixes |
Gaps discovered after go-live can lead to expensive rework and delays. |
These risks aren’t theoretical. According to Gartner, over 70% of ERP initiatives will fail to meet their business case goals by 2027, with nearly one in four failing outright. Choosing the wrong implementation methodology can significantly increase that risk, especially if your needs fall outside of standardized practices.
Free Download: NetSuite Implementation Handbook
Get a practical, step-by-step guide to planning, process readiness, and execution. This handbook helps your team avoid delays, stay aligned, and lead a successful NetSuite implementation from day one.
Download the Handbook
What Is the BRD-Based NetSuite Implementation Methodology?
What does BRD mean in a NetSuite implementation?
The BRD methodology is a traditional NetSuite implementation approach focused on customization. It begins with a detailed analysis of your current (“as-is”) processes and defines future (“to-be”) workflows in a formal document. This roadmap guides the project through waterfall stages: design, development, testing, and deployment.
Unlike SuiteSuccess, which is template-driven, the BRD methodology provides full flexibility to tailor the system around your business, not the other way around.
What are the advantages of the BRD methodology in NetSuite implementations?
The BRD-based NetSuite implementation methodology is ideal for businesses that require flexibility, regulatory alignment, or deep customization. It allows consultants to tailor the ERP to complex workflows, instead of forcing your business to conform to templates.
Key Advantages of BRD-Based Implementations:
| Advantage | Business Value |
|---|---|
|
Customization Flexibility |
Fully adapts to unique processes, systems, and compliance requirements. |
|
Process Clarity |
In-depth mapping of current and future workflows improves system alignment. |
|
Stronger Team Alignment |
Collaborative discovery ensures buy-in across departments and roles. |
|
Freedom from Defaults |
No need to rely on NetSuite’s assumptions or leading practices. |
|
Fewer Post-Go-Live Fixes |
Clear requirements reduce rework and long-term deployment risks. |
What are the risks of using a BRD-based NetSuite implementation methodology?
While BRD-based implementations offer full customization, they often require more time, effort, and oversight. The added flexibility can introduce risks if legacy workflows aren’t reevaluated or if scope changes during execution.
Common Limitations of BRD-Based Implementations:
| Limitation | Explanation |
|---|---|
|
Extended Timelines |
Discovery, documentation, and testing phases can prolong the go-live date. |
|
High Resource Demand |
Requires significant time from internal teams for interviews and approvals. |
|
Delayed ROI |
Longer project cycles mean a slower realization of business value. |
|
Risk of Preserving Inefficiencies |
Without proper evaluation, outdated processes may carry over. |
|
Scope Creep |
Customization-heavy projects are more likely to shift requirements midstream. |
Not Sure Which Method is Right for You?
Consult with our NetSuite experts to identify the best-fit implementation model for your business goals, team capacity, and timeline.
Request a ConsultationConclusion: Which NetSuite implementation methodology is right for you?
SuiteSuccess and BRD-based approaches each offer benefits, but neither is a one-size-fits-all solution. Your decision should reflect the complexity of your operations, customization needs, and timeline.
At AlphaBOLD, we recommend a hybrid implementation methodology that combines the speed of SuiteSuccess with the flexibility of BRD-based discovery. This allows for faster go-lives without sacrificing functionality that matters to your business.
With the right approach, you can reduce risk, control costs, and set your ERP project up for success.
Need Help Planning Your ERP Rollout?
Our team can help you apply the right methodology based on your goals and constraints.
Request a ConsultationExplore Recent Blog Posts
Related Posts
Customization & Integration
